Gun control is one of the worst things you can do to the country. People who shoot children in elementary schools or college kids at universities or people just watching Batman are going to get guns. Somehow, some way, these mass murderers are going to find a gun... or two or three, whether there is a ban or not.
Now, the 99.9999999% of people who are NOT going to do this, but are using their guns for sport or self defense, can't have more than 10 rounds in their gun? Obama is obliterating the Second Amendment.
Thomas Jefferson said, "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants."
So true! If those of us who aren't going to rip a school or theater to shreds can't buy guns for self defense, who is going to take down those who are?
If those teachers had guns at that school, the fatalities would be much lower. Of course, teachers can't have guns at school. That would be absurd. Who would ever want a teacher to be able to protect his/her students in case of an attack? The liberals are literally out of their minds.
That is all.
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Friday, December 21, 2012
sandy hook
First of all, this was a terrible tragedy, and this post is not meant to be insensitive to the families and friends, but to simply point out how Obama is using it, along with many other shootings, to destroy our Second Amendment rights. And doing it in a completely unconstitutional way.
We have the right to bear arms. Guns, knives, etc. So now, because a handful of crazies decide to abuse that right, we're all going to have that right limited? Not ok. But this isn't the first time the president takes advantage of his position and mocks our Founding Fathers' document.
Ridiculous. There will surely be more to come.
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
catch up
Ok. So it's been a long time since a posted...
A really long time.
Sue me. No. don't sue me.
Since I last posted, I became Mississippi's Deputy Director for Rick Santorum's Presidential campaign.
Then, was a National Field Director in Louisiana and Pennsylvania.
In March, Mississippi had its primary. The days leading up to the election, Santorum was third in the polls. HowEVER, he pulled through and won! Exciting? Yes. A few weeks later, Louisiana had its primary. Santorum won! Again.
April, Santorum suspended his campaign during the Pennsylvania primary. Sad, but he needed to stay home with his family.
Romney is the candidate.
So that was February through April.
May... got a job doing communications/pr/social media work for a company that works with DHS, NSA, etc.
Then Libya.
September 11- Benghazi. Response to a video? Right. Obama and his cronies (his staff and the liberal media) say it wasn't a terrorist attack. Because if that was the case, terrorists would be attacking under Obama's administration. And everything is going quite swimmingly under him. Right? False. It was a terrorist attack. Plain as day. To make matters worse, there was plenty of time to rescue our people there! But no. Wouldn't want to do that.
November... well, my family had our election party. Remember when I said it was like our Superbowl?
Yeah. Superbowl. Except Romney lost. which was terrible. Now look what we have. Again.
So I guess we're in for a treat for the next 4 years.
A really long time.
Sue me. No. don't sue me.
Since I last posted, I became Mississippi's Deputy Director for Rick Santorum's Presidential campaign.
Then, was a National Field Director in Louisiana and Pennsylvania.
In March, Mississippi had its primary. The days leading up to the election, Santorum was third in the polls. HowEVER, he pulled through and won! Exciting? Yes. A few weeks later, Louisiana had its primary. Santorum won! Again.
April, Santorum suspended his campaign during the Pennsylvania primary. Sad, but he needed to stay home with his family.
Romney is the candidate.
So that was February through April.
May... got a job doing communications/pr/social media work for a company that works with DHS, NSA, etc.
Then Libya.
September 11- Benghazi. Response to a video? Right. Obama and his cronies (his staff and the liberal media) say it wasn't a terrorist attack. Because if that was the case, terrorists would be attacking under Obama's administration. And everything is going quite swimmingly under him. Right? False. It was a terrorist attack. Plain as day. To make matters worse, there was plenty of time to rescue our people there! But no. Wouldn't want to do that.
November... well, my family had our election party. Remember when I said it was like our Superbowl?
Yeah. Superbowl. Except Romney lost. which was terrible. Now look what we have. Again.
So I guess we're in for a treat for the next 4 years.
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
double standards
We all know the media have double standards when it comes to conservatives and liberals/Republicans and Democrats. The double standards are everywhere. And they always seem to favor the liberals. Here's just a few examples.
Double standard #1 - Religion and Politics
Obama can talk about how his Christian faith leads him to believe that the rich should be taxed more and the poor should be taxed less (besides the fact that he's completely twisting what the passage means).
Watch the video here.
If that's what he believes, that's fine. If he wants to base his tax plan on the Bible, go ahead (again, that's not what that passage is referring to, in the least). I'm pretty sure there's nothing in the Constitution that says he can't.
The problem here - the double standard - is when a Republican candidate (currently Gingrich, Paul, Romney and Santorum) bases his political views upon the Bible (or the Book of Mormon), he gets shut down.
So it's perfectly fine for Obama to talk about how his Christian faith affects the implementation of his tax laws. The problem - God forbid a Republican presidential nominee speak a word about how the Bible/religious affiliation affects their political decisions. We would never want to usher a man into the White House with religious convictions - but wait! We already have one! So are we leaving religion at the gate of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue or not?
Double standard #2 - The media's defending of the Left
We all know the media are liberal (besides FoxNews). We all know they're going to defend the Left - which is not what journalists are instructed to do. Journalists are instructed - from day one - to be objective. To not have an opinion. How do I know this? I have a degree in Journalism. For years I was told I couldn't have an opinion - that journalists only report the facts.
So let's look at a recent example. I'm sure most of you have seen it, but just to reiterate...
This is one of Santorum's biggest supporters (through a SuperPAC). The media have been alllll over, not really Friess, as much as they have been Santorum!
God forbid a supporter say something off color. Santorum can't keep tabs on every supporter and what they say. Nor should he have to. That's absurd to even expect he might be able to. He has hundreds and thousands of supporters.
So anyways. They liberal media begin to take shots at Santorum. Big shocker there.
They ask him how he could let something like this happen?
Santorum answers the question beautifully! You can watch the video here. His response is in the first 2 and 1/2 ish minutes.
In addition to answering the question as to why he should not be responsible for the true (but crude) remarks of Mr. Friess, he also points out the double standard - that the liberal media stand up for Obama!
They're disgusting.
Double Standard #3 - The race card
Recently Congressman Allen West (R) made a hugely controversial statement about how the Republicans favor the African American race more than the Democratic Party does in that the Republicans want to stop handouts. The Democratic Party, the party of handouts, will keep the poor enslaved to the government. West calls out the Democratic Party out in enabling the most insidious form of slavery in the world today.
So this was controversial, right?
Here's the double standard. Can you imagine if a White Republican said this?
Double standard #1 - Religion and Politics
Obama can talk about how his Christian faith leads him to believe that the rich should be taxed more and the poor should be taxed less (besides the fact that he's completely twisting what the passage means).
Watch the video here.
If that's what he believes, that's fine. If he wants to base his tax plan on the Bible, go ahead (again, that's not what that passage is referring to, in the least). I'm pretty sure there's nothing in the Constitution that says he can't.
The problem here - the double standard - is when a Republican candidate (currently Gingrich, Paul, Romney and Santorum) bases his political views upon the Bible (or the Book of Mormon), he gets shut down.
So it's perfectly fine for Obama to talk about how his Christian faith affects the implementation of his tax laws. The problem - God forbid a Republican presidential nominee speak a word about how the Bible/religious affiliation affects their political decisions. We would never want to usher a man into the White House with religious convictions - but wait! We already have one! So are we leaving religion at the gate of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue or not?
Double standard #2 - The media's defending of the Left
We all know the media are liberal (besides FoxNews). We all know they're going to defend the Left - which is not what journalists are instructed to do. Journalists are instructed - from day one - to be objective. To not have an opinion. How do I know this? I have a degree in Journalism. For years I was told I couldn't have an opinion - that journalists only report the facts.
So let's look at a recent example. I'm sure most of you have seen it, but just to reiterate...
This is one of Santorum's biggest supporters (through a SuperPAC). The media have been alllll over, not really Friess, as much as they have been Santorum!
God forbid a supporter say something off color. Santorum can't keep tabs on every supporter and what they say. Nor should he have to. That's absurd to even expect he might be able to. He has hundreds and thousands of supporters.
So anyways. They liberal media begin to take shots at Santorum. Big shocker there.
They ask him how he could let something like this happen?
Santorum answers the question beautifully! You can watch the video here. His response is in the first 2 and 1/2 ish minutes.
In addition to answering the question as to why he should not be responsible for the true (but crude) remarks of Mr. Friess, he also points out the double standard - that the liberal media stand up for Obama!
They're disgusting.
Double Standard #3 - The race card
Recently Congressman Allen West (R) made a hugely controversial statement about how the Republicans favor the African American race more than the Democratic Party does in that the Republicans want to stop handouts. The Democratic Party, the party of handouts, will keep the poor enslaved to the government. West calls out the Democratic Party out in enabling the most insidious form of slavery in the world today.
So this was controversial, right?
Here's the double standard. Can you imagine if a White Republican said this?
Monday, February 13, 2012
cpac and the budget
Wow. I haven't posted in a long time.
My last few days have consisted of searching for jobs (since I'm one of Obama's 8.5% unemployed), writing a paper on why congressmen (no I'm not going to be pc) join caucuses and... watching CPAC!
For those of you who don't know what CPAC is, let me inform you.
CPAC is the Conservative Political Action Conference.
No, I was not able to fly to D.C, stay in a hotel for a weekend and attend one of the best events in the United States entire world. I just spent all my money going to South Carolina for two weeks to volunteer for this guy.
 |
Only worthy candidate.
|
Question: Was it worth it volunteering and missing CPAC ;(? Answer: YES!
Just ask this girl.
So I streamed CPAC online. The next best thing. Santorum did amazing! You can watch him here...
Rick Perry, Phyllis Schlafly, Momma Duggar, Herman Cain, Allen West, Tony Perkins, Mitch McConnell, Bobby Jindal, Laura Ingraham, Huckabee, Ann Coulter, Boehner, Paul Ryan, Bachmann, Marco Rubio, Palin, Romney, Gingrich... annnnnd Santorum!! (and some other ones I don't really care to hear)
I would have literally been as close to Heaven as you can get on earth.
Unfortunately, I didn't go.
But I did watch as much as I could. Especially Ann Coulter. My role model. Here are some of the highlights of her 20+ minute speech.
The budget.
$3.8 trillion? What does this mean?
Well, by the time he's out of office (if he stays in, God help us all), we will be at ehh... a mere 18, 19, 20 trillion (trillion with a t) dollars.
The Bush tax cuts for the wealthy will end, and they'll be taxed at a ridiculous rate.
Oh. And since we're not spending money on wars... that's referred to as savings now.
He's a genius. And by genius, I mean an absolute idiot when it comes to a budget (and many other things I don't have time for now). My 11-year-old brother could do a better job.
It's not just Obama, though. It's all the liberals. Spending to get us into a better place, financially? That makes no sense. And taxing the rich because Obama's Christian faith in the Bible says that "To whom much is given much is required." That's not at all what that verse is referring to. And since when is Obama such a devout Christian? And if he were, wouldn't he be proud to call our nation a Christian one?
Back to spending and taxes: Jesus would also never be in favor of taxing the rich more. He was the one who told the parable of the servants who were given different amounts of money. One 5 talents, one 2, one 1. You can read the parable here.
Enough for one post.
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
the three R's
I realize I haven't written in close to a week. Shouldn't be writing right now, actually, since I came to the library intending on writing a paper (which I will get to, eventually). BUT as I sit beside my sister, I get slightly disgusted, not by her, but at how the people at The University of Southern Mississippi have begun to ooze their liberal ideology into her...
She's a elementary education/special education/Spanish endorsement major (overachiever).
They should be teaching her the basic three R's... Reading, writing, 'rithmatic.
Instead - what three R's are they teaching everybody at USM? Yep.
You guessed it.
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle.
I remember when I lived on campus, each dorm room had a white trash can and a blue recycling can.
My room had two different colored trash cans.
I was conserving energy! I only had to take the trash out half as often!
Don't get me wrong. It's really not that I don't think we should protect the earth. I do. I believe God gave us dominion over the animals and the earth and we are to protect it and take care of it all.
Here's where I have a problem.
When the tree huggers and the hippies can fight for a mother's right to abort the life inside of her, but when we put the paper in the white trash can instead of the blue one... God forbid. An innocent tree might be chopped down. The world would end.
It's not like we're running out of trees. Drive I-20 from Atlanta to Charleston. There's plenty of trees. And nothing else.
The tree scarcity argument is a myth. I always knew it was. So I finally researched it.
Plenty of Trees
Don't get me started on why we shouldn't drill to save a few animals (drill, baby drill!) or farmers in California losing their livelihood over a tiny fish.
Liberals are out of control.
Additionally - is it just me, or is this country in a lot of debt? Isn't unemployment pretty high? I know the president seems to think everything's just fine and dandy, but I don't really trust much of what he says.
So, if recycling costs more than it does good, if farmers lost their jobs because of a fish?, and if we could drill on our own land, wouldn't we be a little (or a lot) better off?
If it were not such a huge deal and actually more good than it actually does, I might recycle. Is it blown way out of proportion? Absolutely. Am I a little rebellious and throw non recyclables in the recycle bins sometimes? Maybe.
Sorry I'm not sorry.
She's a elementary education/special education/Spanish endorsement major (overachiever).
They should be teaching her the basic three R's... Reading, writing, 'rithmatic.
Instead - what three R's are they teaching everybody at USM? Yep.
You guessed it.
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle.
I remember when I lived on campus, each dorm room had a white trash can and a blue recycling can.
My room had two different colored trash cans.
I was conserving energy! I only had to take the trash out half as often!
Don't get me wrong. It's really not that I don't think we should protect the earth. I do. I believe God gave us dominion over the animals and the earth and we are to protect it and take care of it all.
Here's where I have a problem.
When the tree huggers and the hippies can fight for a mother's right to abort the life inside of her, but when we put the paper in the white trash can instead of the blue one... God forbid. An innocent tree might be chopped down. The world would end.
It's not like we're running out of trees. Drive I-20 from Atlanta to Charleston. There's plenty of trees. And nothing else.
The tree scarcity argument is a myth. I always knew it was. So I finally researched it.
Plenty of Trees
Don't get me started on why we shouldn't drill to save a few animals (drill, baby drill!) or farmers in California losing their livelihood over a tiny fish.
Liberals are out of control.
Additionally - is it just me, or is this country in a lot of debt? Isn't unemployment pretty high? I know the president seems to think everything's just fine and dandy, but I don't really trust much of what he says.
So, if recycling costs more than it does good, if farmers lost their jobs because of a fish?, and if we could drill on our own land, wouldn't we be a little (or a lot) better off?
If it were not such a huge deal and actually more good than it actually does, I might recycle. Is it blown way out of proportion? Absolutely. Am I a little rebellious and throw non recyclables in the recycle bins sometimes? Maybe.
Sorry I'm not sorry.
Friday, January 27, 2012
florida debate
So if you missed last night's debate like I did, you can watch it here. First of all, not to be negative, because we all know I'm the princess of positivity, but Romney and Gingrich were terrible. I mean, really.
Tax returns.
Private sector.
Career Politician.
Fannie Mae. Freddie Mac.
We get it. We got it 35 debates ago when they started all this nonsense.
Finally, somebody called them out on their petty drama. Who? None other than the vest man himself! About 35-36 minutes into the debate, Santorum confronted the two middle school girls... I mean... the speaker and the governor.
"Can we set aside that Newt was a member of Congress and used the skills that he developed as a member of Congress to go out and advise companies, and that's not the worst thing in the world, and that Mitt Romney is a wealthy guy because he worked hard, and he's going out and working hard. And can you guys leave that alone and focus on the issues?"
Tax returns.
Private sector.
Career Politician.
Fannie Mae. Freddie Mac.
We get it. We got it 35 debates ago when they started all this nonsense.
Finally, somebody called them out on their petty drama. Who? None other than the vest man himself! About 35-36 minutes into the debate, Santorum confronted the two middle school girls... I mean... the speaker and the governor.
"Can we set aside that Newt was a member of Congress and used the skills that he developed as a member of Congress to go out and advise companies, and that's not the worst thing in the world, and that Mitt Romney is a wealthy guy because he worked hard, and he's going out and working hard. And can you guys leave that alone and focus on the issues?"
Good job, Rick! He did so well last night! Nailed every question. Responded to every comment. Nobody has any accusations against him - why? Because his record is clean! Definitely the winner. No doubt.
Now that we've crowned him the winner, can I just please say how completely and utterly terrible Newt's "my wife would be the best first lady" response was? (About an hour and 15 minutes into the debate) Honestly. I mean, he's told us the reason he divorced his second wife and ushered Callista into the Gingrich's Wives Club.
Why? Because it was going to help him become president. - because she was first lady material? Please. He could be her father. Then his response was so... unflattering. He's completely unelectable on the divorce reason alone. None of our presidents have ever been divorced (apart from Reagan, which really nobody ever knew about - and she left him.). And it's not that America's never run a divorced candidate. Because we have. And they haven't made it. So if a man who's been divorced once can't make it to the White House, how in the world would we think that Gingrich, currently on wife #3 (no telling what will happen if Callista doesn't win him the White House), could ever make it?!
That's beyond me.
Statistically, electing a divorced candidate isn't going to happen. Newt fans, you need to rally behind Santorum. Your vote's going to be wasted!
As long as we're on the topic of supporting Santorum, all you Paulites need to realize your candidate is never going to win. He didn't in 1988. He didn't in 2008. He won't in 2012. You're also wasting your vote.
Let's all rally behind and support Rick Santorum! He's the stark contrast and change we need to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!
Now that we've crowned him the winner, can I just please say how completely and utterly terrible Newt's "my wife would be the best first lady" response was? (About an hour and 15 minutes into the debate) Honestly. I mean, he's told us the reason he divorced his second wife and ushered Callista into the Gingrich's Wives Club.
Why? Because it was going to help him become president. - because she was first lady material? Please. He could be her father. Then his response was so... unflattering. He's completely unelectable on the divorce reason alone. None of our presidents have ever been divorced (apart from Reagan, which really nobody ever knew about - and she left him.). And it's not that America's never run a divorced candidate. Because we have. And they haven't made it. So if a man who's been divorced once can't make it to the White House, how in the world would we think that Gingrich, currently on wife #3 (no telling what will happen if Callista doesn't win him the White House), could ever make it?!
That's beyond me.
Statistically, electing a divorced candidate isn't going to happen. Newt fans, you need to rally behind Santorum. Your vote's going to be wasted!
As long as we're on the topic of supporting Santorum, all you Paulites need to realize your candidate is never going to win. He didn't in 1988. He didn't in 2008. He won't in 2012. You're also wasting your vote.
Let's all rally behind and support Rick Santorum! He's the stark contrast and change we need to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)